The obvious place to begin this blog is with the collapse of Lehman Brothers. Leaving aside the wider ramifications - I am not in a position to discuss those - the fall of Lehmans has done two things.
One, it has left many investors potentially nursing large capital losses and, two, it has highlighted - in the worst possible way - the dangers of counterparty risk. The IMA, whose statement prior to Lehman's collapse now seems particularly prescient, has won plaudits for flagging the latter issue, and no doubt it had a valid point with respect to transparency: providers have, on the whole, failed dismally to tackle accusations of opacity. Clearly, the widely accepted practice of simply stating “assets provided by an issuer rated A by Standard and Poors” in marketing literature has to sto...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes