Phil Jeynes warns that removing components from simple products may mean weaker cover for clients.
Nobody so far has been able to explain to me exactly what they mean by a "simple product" in the context of protection. Whenever I'm asked if I think simple products are a good idea, I say "yes", but I contend that the products we have at present are simple enough. How much more simplistic than life insurance can you get? The fixation seems to be around the complexity underlying some protection products - serious illness cover, for example covers 161 conditions and critical illness contracts offer protection for dozens of diseases; surely this means they are too difficult for Joe P...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes