Greg Becker fears the RDR may worsen consumer detriment as fewer people seek advice.
The key aim of the retail distribution review (RDR) is to remove consumer detriment. We are told the cost will be high. As an industry we can perhaps accept those costs as long as the goals are indeed achieved. We are also told that the costs will be small in comparison to the future avoidance of consumer detriment. As a nation, however, we are living through the most difficult financial crisis since the 1920s and many families are struggling, not just with protection insurance and financial planning but with basic day-to-day household costs. The RDR itself may be focused on ...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes