Few topics irritate the financial advisory community as much as the Financial Services Compensation Scheme (FSCS).
And not without good reason: advisers have had to shell out millions in recent years to meet compensation claims arising from the failures of businesses they had little or nothing to do with. In the most extreme example, investment advisers were the first to be asked to stump up to meet claims brought about by the collapse of Keydata, even though many considered the company to be a product provider, not distributor. Regardless, successful claims against Keydata were so numerous that advisers were always going to have to pay something towards compensating its customers. This was becaus...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes