With the government's consultation on a 60% cut to the MPAA this April closing today, Rachel Vahey calls for a stay of execution - at least until better evidence can be collected on how people are actually using pension freedom
Whisper it quietly but last November's Autumn Statement could almost have been labelled boring - were it not for the announcement reducing the Money Purchase Annual Allowance (MPAA). The Treasury wants to cut the MPAA from £10,000 to £4,000 from this April but the arguments backing up its case are a little shaky. It says it is concerned too many people are ‘double-dipping' on tax relief - in other words, taking benefits out of pension schemes just to reinvest them again and earn another 25% tax-free portion. With the advent of pension freedoms, many more people are accessing some of t...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes