Peter Doherty: The earth isn't flat - the case for contingent fees

‘Commoditised’ v ‘value-added’

clock • 5 min read

Despite what their many critics might say, argues Peter Doherty, contingent fees can deliver the best outcome for clients and indeed, in the context of defined benefit transfers, non-contingent fees are a bad idea

There has of late been plenty of criticism directed towards advisers who charge contingent fees. This criticism is wholly misplaced, I believe - and in fact, for many transactions, it is non-contingent fee structures that are more likely to deliver worse outcomes for customers as a whole.    What is more, it is easy to show that non-contingent fees generate a much higher total fee pool for advisers than contingent fees - and with no additional benefit to customers.   The single most frequent - sometimes only - criticism of contingent charging is this creates an incentive structure whe...

To continue reading this article...

Join Professional Adviser for free

  • Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
  • Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
  • Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
  • Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
  • Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
  • Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes

Join

 

Already a Professional Adviser member?

Login

More on Your profession

News editor's view: 40s are the new 50s - a move in the right direction? 

News editor's view: 40s are the new 50s - a move in the right direction? 

The news editor's Friday Night Takeaway from 1 May

Isabel Baxter
clock 01 May 2026 • 3 min read
Feel Good Friday: FOS chooses Dementia UK as charity partner

Feel Good Friday: FOS chooses Dementia UK as charity partner

Will support Dementia UK over the next two years

Professional Adviser
clock 01 May 2026 • 1 min read
Why 50:50 parenting doesn't necessarily mean no child maintenance

Why 50:50 parenting doesn't necessarily mean no child maintenance

'In many cases, one parent will meet a greater share of the children’s financial needs'

Clizia Motterle
clock 01 May 2026 • 4 min read