The new clause being proposed as an amendment to the Financial Guidance and Claims Bill is nothing more than an excuse to wait and see, argues Stephen Lowe, when what is really needed is some 'get up and go'
The removal of a House of Lords amendment to the Financial Guidance and Claims Bill has come under fire not so much for the decision to take it out as for the impotence of the replacement clause. What is the point of new law that will not change anything? Poor take-up of free and impartial pension guidance - a key consumer protection measure in the era of ‘freedom and choice' - was one of the reasons the government decided to roll three separate consumer support organisations into one. The government had signalled its support for "a stronger nudge" towards guidance and, in committee, ...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes