Investors should not mechanically stick to risk-on or risk-off asset classes as they have fluid correlations over time, writes Anthony Rayner, but portfolios do benefit from the 'shock-absorption' of 'safe-haven' investments
Choosing between risk-on and risk-off assets is a fairly permanent consideration for many investors as it has implications across the range of asset classes. In reality, it depends very much on the drivers of the particular episode - for example, gold might be a better haven than US Treasuries in an inflationary environment. At the same time, it is important to consider the state of the assets before the episode starts - for example, if bonds are extremely overvalued, with compressed yields, their safe haven potential will be more limited. Even if all of these factors are considered, ...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes