Given recent debates among various academics and practitioners, you may find this hard to believe but, writes Brendan McCurdy, the magnitude of a portfolio's ups and downs should still matter hugely to investors
Is volatility, as a measure of risk, dead? Of course not. You might not think it, given recent debates among quite a few academics and practitioners, but the magnitude of a portfolio's ups and downs matters hugely. Risk, the argument goes, should be defined as the chance of outliving one's money due to permanent loss of capital. Volatility is viewed as short-term noise. From here, the case follows that investors should hold all equities because the short-term noise does not matter. The only problem is, the anti-volatility crowd's claims of realism are usually anything but realistic. W...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes