A cashflow process is not an end in itself, argues Greg Davies, as he runs through a number of reasons why, judged against what they are trying to achieve, stochastic tools may not add much value in financial planning
Cashflow modelling has long been at the core of financial planning. It is where diagnosis of the past and predictions of the future come together to prescribe actions for the present. In effect, it is an attempt to solve a puzzle - how should you account for long-term uncertainty in your short-term actions? A scattering of puzzle-solving approaches has evolved, though each boils down to a cost-benefit analysis of a lifetime of ins and outs: of income, inheritances, goals, and gifts; and appropriately weighting the likelihood and influence of each. Evolution repurposes existing feature...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes