Clare Moffat looks at the outcome of the long-running Staveley case which brought clarity to IHT liabilities in light of pension transfers or switches made in ill-health. Here she explains everything advisers need to know
The long-running case of Commissioners for Her Majesty's Revenue and Customs (Respondent) v Parry and others (2020) - also known as the Staveley case - has hit the press again. While the facts of the case date back to 2005/06 it remains of huge importance to advisers due to its implications for those clients who make a pension transfer or switch in ill-health and death happens within two years. There has been an increase in such cases post-pension freedoms as a means of accessing death benefit flexibility and the ability to cascade wealth through the generations. After the Court of ...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes