Advisers breathed a collective sigh of relief following the Supreme Court's decision in the Staveley case, around IHT on transfers made by clients in ill-health. Here Neil MacGillivray reflects on the ground-breaking judgement, which echoed a case he'd tried to help an adviser with several years ago …
It wasn't quite as contentious as "Staveley", but was still based on HM Revenue & Custom's (HMRC) opinion that there can be inheritance tax (IHT) consequences where a person in ill-health transfers from one pension scheme to another, and these can have serious implications. The adviser was asked by a friend, who was terminally ill, to help him put his affairs in order. As part of the review, the adviser recommended that his friend, and now client, should transfer his three personal pension schemes into one arrangement. The reason was simply to reduce the administrative burden on his de...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes