In the third part of a three-part series, Karl Dines explores how to best construct a charging strategy and whether it should be different for post-retirement advice
In the first of this series of three articles, we explored the butterfly effect and the early days of the Retail Distribution Review (RDR). The world didn't end but it did profoundly change the way firms were remunerated. In the second we looked at how firm remuneration changed from being provider-driven to client-driven and, in this third article, we will explore how one might consider constructing a charging strategy in more detail, and whether it should, or should not, be different for post-retirement advice. The phrase ‘clear, fair and not misleading' often crops up in regulator p...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes