Joseph Adunse looks at the Supreme Court ruling in HMRC and Raymond Tooth, which he describes as a 'comedy of errors'
There are many tax cases that go through the various levels of the British judicial system, but few go as far as the Supreme Court. The case between HM Revenue & Customs and Raymond Tooth is among the rarities. The facts of the case are complicated but, broadly, Mr Tooth entered into a tax avoidance scheme - the intended result of which was to give him an employment income loss. The loss was to be used in the tax year prior to that in which it was said to have occurred. In an unforeseen circumstance, deficiencies with Mr Tooth's tax return software meant the loss could not be included in...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes