Know thyself, then invest

clock • 2 min read

Partner Insight: The team responsible for managing LGIM's Multi-Asset Targeted Return Fund discuss how they overcome a range of individual investment and behavioural biases in order to deliver a cash +5% return target

Watch the managers discuss their strategic approach to the MATR fund.

 

Diversity of thought is central to effective decision making, and as such it is an important argument for greater diversity in investment teams. It is not enough to just hire the right people, however; teams must also make the most of every person, which means ensuring all voices are heard. But that is easier said than done. Large groups are predisposed to a number of biases: authority bias, for instance, whereby decisions are overly impacted by senior individuals; or shared information bias, when more time is spent discussing topics with which the group is already familiar, encouraging a narrow focus and consensus views.

Musical chairs

To limit the risk of overemphasising the most senior views and biasing the team towards how those views are framed, we rotate the chair person at our weekly brainstorming meetings and encourage topics from across the team. For similar reasons, we also rotate who contributes to certain parts of our investment process. The agenda also changes to help combat anchor and adjustment problems, where the first item of the day tends to become overemphasised (the anchor) and insufficiently deviated from (the adjustment).

The folly of crowds

The benefit of group decision-making is often lauded as ‘the wisdom of crowds'. The average guess from a crowd of people for the number of jelly beans in a jar tends to be close to the correct number, even if many individual guesses are poor.

When it comes to investing, however, market pricing already reflects the average view of thousands of investors. Crowd-based decision-making within the team leads to very similar views and stops us from finding mispriced opportunities. With this in mind, we implement flexible, diverse and small (3-6 people) investment discussion groups that are likely to yield different perspectives on the issue in question.

More on Partner Insight

Partner Insight: Carry forward – where do people go wrong?

Partner Insight: Carry forward – where do people go wrong?

Fiona Hanrahan, Senior Pensions Development and Technical Manager, Royal London
clock 04 March 2025 • 5 min read
Partner Insight: How philanthropy advice could head off a client crisis

Partner Insight: How philanthropy advice could head off a client crisis

Younger clients are more likely to want advice on charitable giving

Gareth Jones
clock 08 February 2024 • 1 min read
Partner Insight: Cash vs investing — five key points to consider when talking to clients

Partner Insight: Cash vs investing — five key points to consider when talking to clients

Gillian Hepburn
clock 19 October 2023 • 5 min read

In-depth

Sudden departures and a government review – what next for the FOS?

Sudden departures and a government review – what next for the FOS?

A look at the Ombudsman’s roadmap to modernisation

Isabel Baxter
clock 07 April 2025 • 6 min read
Advisers avoid 'knee-jerk' dismissal of US equities amid Trump's tariff shake-up

Advisers avoid 'knee-jerk' dismissal of US equities amid Trump's tariff shake-up

‘Although many market values have fallen, the fundamentals remain largely intact’

Isabel Baxter
clock 03 April 2025 • 5 min read
'A divisive and difficult topic': Advice firms on DE&I progress

'A divisive and difficult topic': Advice firms on DE&I progress

Industry shares thoughts on regulator’s adjustments

Isabel Baxter
clock 31 March 2025 • 6 min read