Partner Insight: Carry forward – where do people go wrong?

clock • 5 min read
Partner Insight: Carry forward – where do people go wrong?

In the run up to tax year end your clients will likely be looking to make use of their 2024/25 allowances and reliefs if they haven't already.

If they are looking to pay the maximum into their pension without a tax charge applying, then it will likely be necessary to work out their unused annual allowance using carry forward. The Budget in March 2023 announced increases to the annual allowance and money purchase annual allowance (MPAA) as well as changes to the tapered annual allowance. So since 6 April 2023, many clients will find themselves able to pay in more, importantly without a tax charge applying.

When using carry forward, it is important to be accurate, as the consequences of getting the calculation wrong can mean an annual allowance tax charge for the client, or even contributions needing to be refunded.

Over the years at Royal London our Technical Team has checked many hundreds of carry forward calculations so they have a very good idea of where the main mistakes are made. I thought I'd share these with you so that you don't do the same.

Where do people go wrong?

The main mistakes people make when working out unused annual allowance are listed below:

Getting mixed up between annual allowance and tax relief

When you are using carry forward, you are working out the unused annual allowance not unused tax relief. So, it's important to remember that for an individual contribution, the client will still need earnings in the year of payment to support the contribution. For example, if there is £100,000 worth of unused annual allowance, the client will need earnings of at least this in order to make an individual contribution of this level and receive tax relief.

A client with earnings of less than £60,000 will likely not need to use carry forward if they are making an individual contribution as this is within the standard annual allowance for 2024/25.

Forgetting about the MPAA or tapered annual allowance

Both of these have an impact on how much annual allowance is available. If the client has triggered the MPAA, then it's not possible to use carry forward to increase contributions to defined contribution schemes above £10,000 without an annual allowance tax charge applying. Carry forward will still be available for any defined benefit (DB) schemes.

The tapered annual allowance rules apply from tax year 2016/17 onwards. So in theory, could apply to all four tax years in the carry forward calculation. If the taper does apply, carry forward can still be used and the standard annual allowance in that year is simply substituted by the tapered annual allowance for each year it applies. Remember also the taper parameters changed with effect from 6 April 2023, so you could be using two different methods of calculating the reduction due to the taper within your carry forward calculation.

Don't handle employer contributions correctly

Employer contributions, as well as individual and 3rd party contributions, count towards the annual allowance. So, these should be included when working out the unused annual allowance.

Don't handle a previous carry forward correctly

When using carry forward, you maximise the current year first before going back to your earliest year and work forwards. So, if an earlier year includes a contribution of more than the annual allowance for that year, you therefore know there will be no annual allowance remaining from that year to carry forward to the current year.

Get confused about the eligibility for carry forward

Anyone who was a member of a pension scheme in the year they are carrying forward from is eligible to use carry forward in the current year. The definition of carry forward for this purpose is very broad and includes active, deferred, pension credit and pensioner members. Really the only clients not eligible to use carry forward would be those taking out a pension for the very first time. It is not necessary to make contributions using carry forward to a current scheme, these can be made to a brand new scheme.

Trying to calculate DB pension input periods themselves

When working out the available annual allowance for a DB scheme, it is important to obtain a history of pension input amounts from the scheme. The calculation of the pension input amount can be complicated and different schemes will have different ways of calculating pensionable service and salary. Changed annual pension inputs in Public Sector DB schemes as a result of the McCloud remedy also present a challenge here.

Forget about the complications of the 2015/16 tax year

A carry forward calculation for 2024/25 will not normally include the 2015/16 tax year but it might still be necessary to be aware of the differences for 2015/16. For example, you might be checking a historic carry forward calculation for a client or checking there is enough carry forward to cover a previous year. For 2015/16 the pre-alignment period, the period between 6 April 2015 and 8 July 2015, had an annual allowance of £80,000 with a maximum of £40,000 able to be carried forward to the post-alignment period which was the remainder of the tax year.

Knowing the most common mistakes people make with carry forward calculations will hopefully make sure you are fully prepared for your tax year end, saving you time and potentially a tax charge for your clients.

 

Fiona Hanrahan is a Senior Pensions Development and Technical Manager at Royal London

More on Partner Insight

Partner Insight: How philanthropy advice could head off a client crisis

Partner Insight: How philanthropy advice could head off a client crisis

Younger clients are more likely to want advice on charitable giving

Gareth Jones
clock 08 February 2024 • 1 min read
Partner Insight: Cash vs investing — five key points to consider when talking to clients

Partner Insight: Cash vs investing — five key points to consider when talking to clients

Gillian Hepburn
clock 19 October 2023 • 5 min read
Partner Insight: Is 'strategic' still a dirty word? That depends...

Partner Insight: Is 'strategic' still a dirty word? That depends...

Some strategic bond funds are more effective than others

Gareth Jones
clock 15 August 2023 • 1 min read

In-depth

How FCA could tackle review of 'opaque' MPS market

How FCA could tackle review of 'opaque' MPS market

Target market an expected focus as propositions have ‘questions to answer’

Isabel Baxter
clock 03 March 2025 • 4 min read
FCA's ongoing advice services findings 'encouraging' but work not over

FCA's ongoing advice services findings 'encouraging' but work not over

Advisers said to be breathing collective sigh of relief

Jen Frost
clock 24 February 2025 • 7 min read
Financial abuse: The silent crime advisers must learn to detect

Financial abuse: The silent crime advisers must learn to detect

Should the industry be doing more to protect vulnerable clients?

Sahar Nazir
clock 18 February 2025 • 5 min read