Fiona Murphy asks what the impact of the FSA's paper restricting UCIS promotion will mean for the SIPP market
The FSA's consultation on UCIS has been a long time in coming. High profile failures and screaming headlines about these investments have fuelled debate in the SIPP market. Should they be permitted? Who are they suitable for? And who should have responsibility for screening whether these investments stack up? Added to that, SIPP providers questioned whether higher capital adequacy rules and levies would come in to hedge against investment failures, placing more pressure on their business models. The FSA's recent proposals have provided some clarity on these questions. The paper has pr...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes