Term assurance for people aged over 70 will continue to be classed as an investment product under the Financial Services Authority's (FSA) new rules, despite all other term assurance being classed as general insurance.
Guests at COVER's Think Tank debate on regulation disagreed with the FSA's decision to keep term assurance that runs past clients' 70th birthdays as an investment product. As more people work past retirement age and have longer mortgage terms, it is likely more clients will demand longer terms on protection. Speaking at the debate, Nick Kirwan, head of protection at Scottish Provident, said: 'Advisers could find themselves in a position ' if they offer an increased term ' where they are suddenly using the wrong sales process with the wrong literature and it may even be with the wrong auth...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes