Forced retirement at 65 can be justified under European law only if it is a "proportionate" means of achieving a legitimate employment policy, European judges have ruled.
The European Court of Justice ruled in the long running Heyday test case this morning. The case was started by Age Concern backed group Heyday in 2006 when it challenged mandatory retirement ages. The European Court ruled national legislation may generally provide that this kind of "difference of treatment on grounds of age" is justified if it is a proportionate means to achieve a legitimate social policy objective related to employment policy, the labour market or vocational training. The judgement said: "By their public interest nature, those legitimate aims are distinguishable from p...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes