Birmingham Council's raising eligibility thresholds for adult care to "critical" have been judged unlawful.
In a case highlighting long term care issues brought by four disabled residents, who cannot be named for legal reasons, concerns over the city's cutbacks were upheld by the High Court. The threshold is the fourth and most severe definition out of mild, moderate, substantial and critical. The court said Birmingham's proposal to raise criteria from substantial was unlawful because the council had failed to pay due regard to the impact on disabled people, contravening Section 49a of the Disability Discrimination Act. Birmingham City Council planned to reduce care packages by around 5...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes