Low cost should never be confused with value for money, warns Mickey Morrissey, and yet the latter consideration can often be neglected when evaluating discretionary management strategies
The cost of investing has become a priority for regulators and investors alike. High costs can exert a meaningful drag on long-term returns and should undoubtedly form part of an adviser's decision-making process. That said, low cost should not be confused with value for money, which is often neglected when evaluating discretionary management strategies. In general, a low-cost strategy will incorporate a far higher weighting in passives. Of course there is a place for passive investments in portfolios - they have low fees and can benefit from significant economies of scale. They do, howe...
To continue reading this article...
Join Professional Adviser for free
- Unlimited access to real-time news, industry insights and market intelligence
- Stay ahead of the curve with spotlights on emerging trends and technologies
- Receive breaking news stories straight to your inbox in the daily newsletters
- Make smart business decisions with the latest developments in regulation, investing retirement and protection
- Members-only access to the editor’s weekly Friday commentary
- Be the first to hear about our events and awards programmes